Resource Guide - Hockey Financial Planning

This page covers the financial topics that matter most to professional hockey players and their families — taxes, cross-border planning, insurance, the NHL pension, and more. The goal is clear, practical information with no jargon.

Last reviewed and updated for 2026. Tax rates, limits, and league rules change year to year — figures below are current as of 2026.

Section 1

Taxes & the Jock Tax

How the Jock Tax Works

Professional athletes are subject to income tax in nearly every state where they play or practice. This is commonly called the "jock tax." Rather than paying state income tax only in their state of residence, players must allocate their income across every jurisdiction where they earn it. The allocation method is the duty days calculation: the number of days a player works in a given state divided by their total duty days for the season determines what percentage of income is taxable in that state.¹

A handful of cities levy their own version on top of the state tax, and the exact rules vary from place to place. It is one more layer that does not show up unless someone is watching for it.

A Practical Dollar Example

Consider a player earning $1,000,000 in a season with 200 total duty days. If 10 of those days involve games or practice in California, then 10 ÷ 200 = 5% of income is allocated to California. California then taxes that share at its own rates, which are the highest in the country and, as of 2026, reach past 14% on wage income for the highest earners.²³ Most states run the math by applying their full resident tax to total income and then scaling it down by the allocation percentage, rather than taxing the slice on its own — so the precise figure varies — but even so, a single road series in California can mean several thousand dollars before any other state weighs in. Multiplied across a full schedule, the numbers become significant and unpredictable without active tracking.

No-Tax States Still Have Road Game Obligations

Playing for a team based in Florida, Texas, Nevada, Washington, or Tennessee is a genuine financial advantage — players owe no state income tax on the portion of income earned at home.² But this does not eliminate road game obligations. A player on a Florida-based team who plays road games in California, New York, Minnesota, and Illinois still owes income tax in each of those states on the income allocated to those games. The home state is only part of the equation.

What a Mid-Season Trade Does

A mid-season trade can reshape a player's tax picture almost overnight. Moving from a no-income-tax team to a team in California or New York means the income earned with the new team for the rest of the season is now subject to that state's tax rate. For a player earning $1 million or more annually, the difference between finishing a season in Tampa versus Los Angeles can represent tens of thousands of dollars in new obligations that were not in the original financial plan. The earlier this is modeled and prepared for, the less disruptive it is.

Section 2

Cross-Border & Canadian Planning

Canadian Players on U.S. Teams

Canada taxes based on residency, not citizenship, and Canadian residents are taxed on worldwide income. A Canadian player who keeps significant residential ties to Canada can owe Canadian federal and provincial income tax on total earnings — in addition to U.S. federal income tax and the jock tax in every state where they play. A player who genuinely becomes a non-resident generally owes Canadian tax only on Canadian-source income, which is exactly why residency status carries so much weight (covered below).⁴ The Canada–U.S. Tax Treaty prevents outright double taxation through foreign tax credits, but it does not simplify the process of filing in multiple jurisdictions simultaneously. Both sides of the border must be managed in coordination.¹

U.S. Players on Canadian Teams

U.S. players on Canadian franchises — in Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa, Winnipeg, Calgary, Edmonton, or Vancouver — face Canadian federal and provincial income tax on income earned in Canada, while the U.S. government continues to tax their worldwide income. One point that trips people up: NHL contracts are paid in U.S. dollars no matter which country the team plays in, so the currency question is not about a paycheck shrinking on the way across the border.⁵ It is about managing the accounts, expenses, and any money a player keeps in Canadian dollars while living north of the border. When the U.S. dollar is strong, a U.S.-dollar salary stretches further against Canadian living costs; when it weakens, the math moves the other way. Either way, currency exposure is worth planning around rather than ignoring.

Why Residency Determination Matters

Tax residency is determined by more than where a player happens to live during the season. It includes factors like where their family resides, where they maintain a primary home, the nature and duration of ties to each country, and what elections are made under the applicable tax treaty.⁴ Residency status has a significant impact on overall tax burden and should be reviewed carefully with a qualified cross-border tax specialist before signing any contract that crosses national borders.

Section 3

Insurance & Career Protection

A professional hockey player's income is entirely dependent on their physical ability to play. Unlike most careers where earning power accumulates over decades, a hockey player's peak earning window is short and can be ended by a single injury. Insurance is not optional — it is the foundation of any serious financial plan.

Disability Insurance

Team-provided disability coverage exists but is often insufficient to fully protect a player's contract value. Players should understand exactly what their team policy covers, what it excludes, and what gap exists between that coverage and their actual income. Supplemental disability insurance purchased independently can protect a meaningful portion of contract value in the event of a career-ending or career-interrupting injury. Key variables to understand: the definition of disability used in the policy, the elimination period before benefits begin, the benefit period, and whether the policy is own-occupation or any-occupation.

Career-Ending Injury Insurance

Distinct from standard disability insurance, career-ending injury policies are designed specifically for professional athletes and pay a lump sum benefit if an injury permanently ends a player's ability to compete at the professional level. These policies are most valuable for players signing significant contracts where the financial risk of injury is highest.

Life Insurance

Players with families or dependents should carry life insurance regardless of career stage. Term life insurance is typically the most straightforward and cost-effective option for players in their twenties and thirties.

What Team Insurance Typically Does and Does Not Cover

Team-provided policies are designed primarily to protect the team's interests — not necessarily to fully replace a player's income or protect their long-term financial position. Given how short the average career is, players should never assume team coverage is sufficient without reviewing it independently.⁶

A Note on Timing

Insurance is significantly easier and less expensive to obtain when a player is healthy. The right time to review insurance needs is at the start of a career, at each new contract, and any time a player's family or financial situation changes significantly.

Section 4

The NHL Pension

How Pension Credits Are Accrued

NHL pension credits are earned based on games played and credited seasons. Players accrue credits for each season in which they meet the eligibility thresholds established under the Collective Bargaining Agreement. The maximum benefit is capped by an IRS limit that is indexed every year; for 2026 that ceiling is approximately $290,000 per year. It begins at age 62 and requires a full career's worth of credited seasons to reach.⁷

The Gap Years Problem

The average NHL player retires in their late twenties to early thirties. Even for a player who earns the maximum pension benefit, there are 25 to 35 years between retirement and age 62 when pension payments begin. Those gap years must be funded entirely from personal savings and investments built during the playing career. This is one of the most underappreciated financial challenges in professional hockey.⁶

Not All Players Qualify for the Maximum

Career length is unpredictable. Injuries, trades, and roster decisions can all shorten a career without warning. Players who do not accumulate the credited seasons required for the maximum benefit will receive a reduced pension — or in some cases, none at all. A sound financial plan does not depend on the pension reaching its maximum value.

The Current CBA

The NHL and NHLPA ratified a four-year CBA extension that runs through the 2029–30 season, with its new terms — including a longer 84-game regular season — taking effect in 2026–27.⁸⁹ Compensation structures, escrow arrangements, and benefit terms may evolve as the league and players' association continue to negotiate. Players should stay informed through their agents and advisors as the CBA landscape develops.

Section 5

Frequently Asked Questions

Get Started

Ready to Talk Through Your Situation?

Every player's situation is different. We are happy to have a straightforward conversation about where you are and what would be most useful — no obligation, no jargon.

Schedule a Confidential Intro Call ›

No obligation. No jargon. Just a direct conversation about where you are and where you want to be.